Skip to main content

Trademark “VOLVO” protected in two simultaneous suits before the Delhi High Court

In two concurrent suits filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, ad interim ex-parte orders restraining the Defendants from making use of the Plaintiff’s trademark “Volvo” as a part of their domain name, e-mail ID, trading name or any other manner were passed. The Court also directed the Registrar of Domain names to suspend the operation of the respective domain names (which made use of the mark “VOLVO”) upon receiving communication from the Plaintiff.

1. AB Volvo vs Avantika Holidays

Vide order dated May 31, 2019, the Court passed an ad-interim ex-parte order restraining the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiffs’ trademark VOLVO as a part of the domain name (www.himachalvolvobus.com), e-mail ID (booking@himachalvolvobus.com) and any other manner whatsoever. Additionally, the Court directed the Defendants to produce documentary proof (if any) to ascertain if the use of the mark VOLVO by the Defendants is legitimate.

In addition to the above, the Court also directed the Registrar of Domain Names for the domain name (www.himachalvolvobus.com) to suspend the operation of the domain name upon receiving communication from the Plaintiff.

2. AB Volvo vs Gagan Kumar

Vide order dated May 31, 2019, the Court passed an ad-interim ex-parte order restraining the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiffs’ trademark “DAILY VOLVO BUS SERVICE”, “VOLVO BUS YATRA”, as a part of the domain name volvobusyatra.com and e-mail IDs info@volvobusyatra.com and volvobusyatra560@gmail.com or any other manner similar to the Plaintiff’s trademark VOLVO as a part of their trading name, in relation to buses, tourism-related services or any other services. Additionally, the Court directed the Defendants to produce documentary proof (if any) to ascertain if the use of the mark VOLVO by the Defendants is legitimate.

In addition to the above, the Court also directed the Registrar of Domain Names for the domain name (volvobusyatra.com) to suspend the operation of the domain name upon receiving communication from the Plaintiff.

Team Anand and Anand: Vaishali Mittal, Siddhant Chamola, Vrinda Gambhir and Ankita Sabharwal.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Nov 11, 2026

Think about the apps you use every day. Their visual identity is often the first thing you recognise: the arrangement of icons, navigation menus, buttons,

Can You Patent the Look of an App? GUI and Icon Protection in India
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Nov 07, 2026

Pharmaceutical innovation and access to medicines are closely connected aspects of public health. While patent protection can encourage investment in research

Can Public Health Override a Pharmaceutical Patent? The BPaL Patent Dispute in India
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Nov 04, 2026

Imagine discovering an Instagram account using your company’s name, a website offering products under a deceptively similar identity, or an AI-generated

Can AI Steal Your Brand Identity? Trademark Squatting and AI Misuse in India
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Nov 02, 2026

First published by AsiaIP. Author: Lakshmidevi Somanath Copyright law has traditionally addressed the asymmetry between the costs of creating a work and

What is Copyright Worth When Machines Do the Creating? Lessons from Streaming and Gaming