Skip to main content

Setting precedent for disputes involving a challenge against validity of a patent, the Supreme Court concluded that a party opposing grant of patent cannot pursue revocation petitions before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board and simultaneously seek revocation on the same grounds in a counterclaim before the High Court.

 Wind World India Ltd. (WWIL), an erstwhile joint-venture between the appellants (Enercon GmbH) and the respondents, manufactured wind turbines in India under licences granted by the appellants. Pursuant to termination of the licence agreements, WWIL continued to use the patented technologies. WWIL  filed revocation petitions before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board challenging the validity of the patents , and Enercon  filed patent infringement suits before the Delhi High Court. WWIL further filed counter claims under Section 64 of the Patents Act in the lawsuits pending before the High Court .  What resulted was a litigation ‘gridlock’ with two different forums varying in seniority and jurisdictional scope concurrently faced with the same deliberations, i.e. validity of patents.

Deciding appeals before it, the Supreme Court ruled that the same entity cannot approach multiple forums to seek revocation of the same patent. It held thus: when such a situation of parallel proceedings arises, the prior-instituted proceedings for revocation of the patent must survive, unless the patentee and the entity seeking such revocation mutually agree to continue the later-instituted proceedings – in this case the Court held that having pursued their counter-claims for revocation of the appellant’s patents after they had filed revocation proceedings in the IPAB, the respondents had opted for the latter.

The judgment therefore created a framework that balances the patentee’s rights and a person’s right to challenge the validity of a patent.

Dr. Aloys Wobben and another v Yogesh Mehra and others; CA No. 6718/2013 before the Supreme Court of India

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Apr 12, 2025

‘First Published by Managing IP‘ By: Achuthan Sreekumar Achuthan Sreekumar of Anand and Anand draws on a recent High Court of Delhi ruling

Life and death matter? The protection of well-known personal names in India
Thought Leadership
Mar 27, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Abhishek Paliwal India, one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, is on track to become a

Company Name vs. Trademark: Essential Insights for Establishing Your Business Brand in India
Thought Leadership
Mar 19, 2025

‘First published on Chambers and Partners’ By: Safir Anand and Twinky Rampal Law and Practice  1. Trade Mark and Copyright Law  1.1 Governing

Chambers Trademarks & Copyright 2025 | Law & Practice
Thought Leadership
Mar 19, 2025

‘First published on Chambers and Partners’ By: Safir Anand Introduction The landscape of intellectual property in India is undergoing a significant

Chambers Trademarks & Copyright 2025 | Trends and Developments