Skip to main content

The Delhi High Court Passes an ex parte order injuncting the Defendants from using the mark TATA in any manner

In the Tata Sons Ltd. v. Amar Singh Gupta and Ajay Gupta case, the Defendants were dealing in PVC flexible pipes bearing the mark B TATA ®. After hearing the arguments made by Anand and Anand, the Hon’ble Judge passed an ex parte order injuncting the Defendants from using the mark TATA in any manner whatsoever.

The Hon’ble Judge further appointed a Local Commissioner to visit the premises of the Defendants to seize and seal all infringing goods that may be found in their power and possession. The Local Commissioner has also been empowered to ask the Defendants to disclose the name of the manufacturer/source of the infringing goods so that such goods can also be seized and the infringement can be nipped in the bud.

Read more: https://www.anandandanand.com/?s=TATA

 

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Apr 25, 2025

‘First Published by Chambers and Partners‘ By: Pravin Anand, Achuthan Sreekumar and Rohil Bansal Law and Practice  1. Legal Framework

Trade Secrets 2025
Thought Leadership
Apr 12, 2025

‘First Published by Managing IP‘ By: Achuthan Sreekumar Achuthan Sreekumar of Anand and Anand draws on a recent High Court of Delhi ruling

Life and death matter? The protection of well-known personal names in India
Thought Leadership
Mar 27, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Abhishek Paliwal India, one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, is on track to become a

Company Name vs. Trademark: Essential Insights for Establishing Your Business Brand in India
Thought Leadership
Mar 19, 2025

‘First published on Chambers and Partners’ By: Safir Anand and Twinky Rampal Law and Practice  1. Trade Mark and Copyright Law  1.1 Governing

Chambers Trademarks & Copyright 2025 | Law & Practice