Skip to main content

Roysten Abel director of ‘The Manganiyar Seduction’ succeeds against copycat

The internationally acclaimed theater director, Roysten Abel had filed a suit against the defendants seeking permanent injunction from infringing the copyright, moral rights and passing-off of his dramatic production ‘The Manganiyar Seduction’, an original dramatic work under Section 2 (h) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

This larger than life dramatic work involves a dazzling union between Manganiyar music (a hereditary class of highly skilled folk musicians from the Thar Desert of Rajasthan) and the visual seduction of a unique set consisting of a three dimensional, vertical stage made up of approximately 2,500 kilos of solid wood and metal scaffolding and a platform draped in vivid red curtains and electric light bulbs, which is 40 foot by 25 foot in size.

43 musicians are then seated in 36 red-curtained cubicles arranged in four horizontal rows one on top of the other and the dramatic performance begins when a single cubical lights up and the first singer beings his song. Soon another cubicle lights up and another, thus creating a dramatic and astounding build-up of musical instruments and voice as young men, women, children and the elderly of the Manganiyar community use the theatre to create magic in the music.

The defendants had copied plaintiffs’ fanciful title ‘The Manganiyar Seduction’ as well as the unique feature of the show, i.e., the manner in which the musicians are seated on stage in cubicles and the lighting of the show.

The suit was decreed by virtue of a settlement arrived at between the parties wherein the defendants not only acknowledged the ownership of the Plaintiffs in the original dramatic work ‘The Manganiyar Seduction’ but also agreed to pay damages of Rs.1.5 lakh along with issuing a public apology to the plaintiffs.

 

Read about another Brainchild brought to life by Roysten Abel.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Apr 12, 2025

‘First Published by Managing IP‘ By: Achuthan Sreekumar Achuthan Sreekumar of Anand and Anand draws on a recent High Court of Delhi ruling

Life and death matter? The protection of well-known personal names in India
Thought Leadership
Mar 27, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Abhishek Paliwal India, one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, is on track to become a

Company Name vs. Trademark: Essential Insights for Establishing Your Business Brand in India
Thought Leadership
Mar 19, 2025

‘First published on Chambers and Partners’ By: Safir Anand and Twinky Rampal Law and Practice  1. Trade Mark and Copyright Law  1.1 Governing

Chambers Trademarks & Copyright 2025 | Law & Practice
Thought Leadership
Mar 19, 2025

‘First published on Chambers and Partners’ By: Safir Anand Introduction The landscape of intellectual property in India is undergoing a significant

Chambers Trademarks & Copyright 2025 | Trends and Developments