Skip to main content

The Controller of Patents rejects an application by Yahoo for a method of scheduling and displaying an online presence status of a user of an instant messaging application.

Yahoo’s method of scheduling and displaying an online presence status of a user of an instant messaging (IM) application under Section 3(k) and 3(n) of the Patents Act was denied by the Controller of Patents.

The reasons offered were: the steps of setting, determining, displaying were held to be nothing but computer algorithmic steps for giving a solution to the detailed problem related to scheduling an displaying an online presence status of a user of an instant messaging application; algorithm related claims are even wider than the computer programmes claimed by themselves; the hardware components were a general purpose computer.

Authored by Stuti Dhyani.

This article was published on Patents Rewind.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Nov 07, 2026

Pharmaceutical innovation and access to medicines are closely connected aspects of public health. While patent protection can encourage investment in research

Can Public Health Override a Pharmaceutical Patent? The BPaL Patent Dispute in India
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Nov 04, 2026

Imagine discovering an Instagram account using your company’s name, a website offering products under a deceptively similar identity, or an AI-generated

Can AI Steal Your Brand Identity? Trademark Squatting and AI Misuse in India
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Nov 02, 2026

First published by AsiaIP. Author: Lakshmidevi Somanath Copyright law has traditionally addressed the asymmetry between the costs of creating a work and

What is Copyright Worth When Machines Do the Creating? Lessons from Streaming and Gaming
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Oct 31, 2026

A startup has developed a new technology, filed a patent application and begun building its product. The filing is an important milestone. But what happens

Your Startup Has Filed a Patent. Now What? The Commercial Value of IP