Skip to main content

Archana Shanker and Vidisha Garg explore the protection of therapeutic substances used under folk medicine practices as ‘traditional knowledge’ by special provisions of the patent law.

In October 2012, the government of India exercised its powers conferred under Section 66 of the act to revoke Avesthagen’s patent IN252093, on the grounds that the patent or the mode in which it is exercised is prejudicial to the state or the public.

The recent guidelines seem to extend the government’s sentiments. They aim to provide strict procedures for the screening, allotment and examination of applications relating to traditional knowledge so as to ensure that patents are not granted to inventions relating to traditional knowledge.

This article was published in LSIPR April 2013.

To continue reading, please contact us at email@anandandanand.com

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function
News & Updates
Oct 16, 2025

Being a part of the International Trademarks Association (INTA) is always a delight. Here’s how Anand and Anand would be joining forces with INTA on

Team Anand and Anand for INTA
Thought Leadership
Oct 14, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Arpita Mukherjee When WeWork faced turmoil globally, leading its U.S. parent company to file for

WeWork India’s NSE Listing: A Lesson in Local Execution Within Global Brands
Thought Leadership
Oct 02, 2025

‘First published on India Business Law Journal’ By: Pravin Anand and Dr. Ajai Garg The fourth industrial revolution, driven by artificial intelligence

Independent AI key to India’s global power