Skip to main content

Archana Shanker and Vidisha Garg explore the protection of therapeutic substances used under folk medicine practices as ‘traditional knowledge’ by special provisions of the patent law.

In October 2012, the government of India exercised its powers conferred under Section 66 of the act to revoke Avesthagen’s patent IN252093, on the grounds that the patent or the mode in which it is exercised is prejudicial to the state or the public.

The recent guidelines seem to extend the government’s sentiments. They aim to provide strict procedures for the screening, allotment and examination of applications relating to traditional knowledge so as to ensure that patents are not granted to inventions relating to traditional knowledge.

This article was published in LSIPR April 2013.

To continue reading, please contact us at email@anandandanand.com

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Feb 04, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ The India Cyber Threat Report 2025 by the Data Security Council of India identified Deepfake exploitation as one

Real or Fake? Dealing with Deepfakes Dilemma in Digital Society
Thought Leadership
Sep 25, 2024

‘First published on IAM‘ By: Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola In summary This article covers the biggest judicial decisions in Indian patent

India: recent SEP rulings and evolving jurisprudence shaping patent landscape
News & Updates
Sep 19, 2024

Two key representatives from the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Madrid Registry visited our office on September 19 to understand the needs

WIPO representatives visit Anand and Anand office
News & Updates
Sep 13, 2024

Anand and Anand has been recognised as an ‘Outstanding Firm’ for Intellectual Property in the asialaw 2024 Rankings. We have also been ranked ‘Highly

Asialaw 2024 Rankings