Skip to main content

In proceedings initiated by US pharmaceutical major Pfizer Inc. for infringement of its patent against a Hyderabad based generic drug manufacturer, the Delhi High Court has restrained the defendants from making, selling, distributing, advertising and exporting drugs infringing the suit patent.

The suit was instituted by the plaintiffs in September 2015, after discovering that the defendants were ready to market the generic version of SUTENT, their patented cancer treatment drug. The defendants nevertheless continued to advertise the infringing products on their website in contempt of the court’s order and delayed filing a written statement. Their actions earned the court’s reproach, which, on 16 August 2016, while decreeing the suit in favour of the plaintiffs, directed the defendants to pay costs of Rs.2 million to a cancer research organization in Chennai.

Sugen v KV Prakash

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Apr 12, 2025

‘First Published by Managing IP‘ By: Achuthan Sreekumar Achuthan Sreekumar of Anand and Anand draws on a recent High Court of Delhi ruling

Life and death matter? The protection of well-known personal names in India
Thought Leadership
Mar 27, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Abhishek Paliwal India, one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, is on track to become a

Company Name vs. Trademark: Essential Insights for Establishing Your Business Brand in India
Thought Leadership
Mar 19, 2025

‘First published on Chambers and Partners’ By: Safir Anand and Twinky Rampal Law and Practice  1. Trade Mark and Copyright Law  1.1 Governing

Chambers Trademarks & Copyright 2025 | Law & Practice
Thought Leadership
Mar 19, 2025

‘First published on Chambers and Partners’ By: Safir Anand Introduction The landscape of intellectual property in India is undergoing a significant

Chambers Trademarks & Copyright 2025 | Trends and Developments